Comments for Journal of Ruth

Comment on Protected: I’m such a fake by Kimbugs

Kimbugs — Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:39:55 +0000

Paul — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 22:21:28 +0000

Jungle Pop — Sun, 25 Jun 2006 23:45:23 +0000

I say stick with Journal of Ruth. A catchy name is nice, but it’s your content that will get and keep readers!

Dabido (Teflon) — Sun, 25 Jun 2006 07:51:48 +0000

the bloke — Sat, 24 Jun 2006 21:13:59 +0000

Dabido (Teflon) — Sat, 24 Jun 2006 04:55:16 +0000

T-Ruth.
The Ruth shall set ye free.
Ruthful
Ruthkit [sorry, that's sort of a geek title!]

a friend — Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:36:26 +0000

reminds me of “kernel of truth”. It’s not so bad.

Darth Doug — Fri, 23 Jun 2006 20:09:47 +0000

Ooops … see comment under preceding post for my thoughts, since I goofed up the comment button … ARRGHH!

Darth Doug

Darth Doug — Fri, 23 Jun 2006 20:08:47 +0000

Names … “The Truth of Ruth”?

“Raw Ruth”? Nahh … that’s probably bring in the pervs thinking this is THAT kind of site …

If you leave a job or some such, they become “Ruth-less people”?

You’re Malaysian, right? Shouldn’t the suffix “-lah” be in there somewhere?

–

Darth Doug

– an American who couldn’t use “Lah” correctly if his life depended on it –

cynical-idealist — Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:21:43 +0000

Personally, I like the current name because of the wordplay. It sounds like “journal of truth”, and it has a ring of honesty to it.

But it’s all in your hands.

And also, I didn’t know that the free WP service had this template. Hmm, I’ll go check my own template set to see if they’ve added any new ones.